Home

Advertisement

Accurate Reporting in Birth Options

  • Sep. 29th, 2009 at 11:24 AM

Please sign this petition to the producers of the Today Show: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/accurate-reporting-in-birth-options

You can personalize your signature with your own comment to them.  Here was mine: 

I have already written to you about the importance for including accurate scientific evidence to truly help shed light on the best choices for the health of mothers and babies during the birth process.  Normalizing birth is essential for improving outcomes.  Please watch the video at www.reducinginfantmortality.com to see an evidence-based plan to reduce infant and maternal mortality, which are abysmally high in the US.

Submitted at http://www.insurance.wa.gov/consumers/Complaints.shtml.  Anyone in Washington State who feels that their insurance company has wronged them can file a complaint here, and I'm sure other states have the same services available, by mail if not online.  This is a relatively tame complaint, especially since we could probably afford to pay the bills.  Other misrepresentations of coverage (etc) committed by for-profit insurance companies are literally matters of life and death.  That's why the system needs to change. 
 
 

*        *       *

Based on the advice of an Aetna representative in March 2008, I chose an insurance plan for our family which I thought covered the naturopathic doctor we had chosen for our daughter Ramona.  All our well-baby visit claims were paid by Aetna, from 3/2008 through 2/2009.  However, in May 2009 we received a bill from our doctor stating that Aetna had taken back all payments for all dates of service.  We were shocked and canceled an appointment we had scheduled with he doctor for Ramona later in the month.  When we called the Starbucks benefits center, they told us (much to our surprise) that our plan did not cover naturopaths, but when we called Aetna, thought they confirmed that we did not have benefits for a naturopath, we were told that all claims had been re-paid to our doctor.  Totally confused, we called Starbucks benefit center on 5/26/09, where their rep (Alison) called Aetna.  We had a conference call with Aetna rep Dennis, who said that indeed, we did not have benefits with a naturopath, and that the payment had been made by Aetna in error and had been taken back from the doctor.  I got off the phone with all the information (including claim numbers and dates of service) needed to file an appeal.  When we called Jaye at our doctor's billing service, however, she told us that she had recently received payment for our visits and she no longer showed a balance.  At this point, we didn't know what to do, so we hoped that the payments shown in Jaye's system would be final.  We decided to change our plan to one that we were sure had coverage for naturopaths when we were able, which was in August 2009 during the Starbucks enrollment period, which we have now done.  However, we have also now received a new bill from our doctor's biller showing  that Aetna's payments for DOSs 2/28/09, 3/12/08, & 8/25/08 have indeed been taken back again.  I have not filed an appeal with Aetna because at this point I do not trust any action they take in payment of these claims to be final. 

I want all dates of service listed above to be paid by Aetna as they were initially paid.  If we had known about our lack of ND coverage immediately after our first visit 3/12/08, we would have changed plans or doctors, rather than continuing to accumulate non-covered charges with our ND, and thus we believe that Aetna should honor their original payments. 



* I SUPPORT A PUBLICLY-RUN COMPETITOR TO PRIVATE INSURANCE.  Private insurance is a for-profit business.  Their job is to make money off of insuring people; to make money, they try not to pay for care.  Insurance employees cannot tell a doctor the best way to bill the services provided to the patient.  Private insurance companies are allowed to "quote benefits" to patients and doctor's offices which may be totally inaccurate and to which they are not bound.  On the other hand, Medicaid, PUBLIC insurance for the poor, publishes "billing instructions" which communicate to providers how to be reimbursed for the services they provide, and which services and diagnoses will not be covered.  Customer service reps for Medicaid refer doctors offices to the billing instructions, even consulting the appropriate parts of the instructions for the doctor's representative.  They are clear about what they cover.  Patients need to know what health care will cost them, and in my experience, public insurance is more up-front about what will be covered and how much coverage there will be. 

* I SUPPORT HEALTH INSURANCE THAT COVERS WOMEN MAKING THEIR OWN BEST CHOICES ABOUT REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH.  Women who choose to prevent pregnancy when they are not prepared to be parents save money for their insurer (the state in the case of a public plan).  Women who do not wish to be pregnant but are will save their insurer money by choosing abortion.  Women who are carrying a pregnancy to term and wish to seek midwifery care in an out of hospital setting will save their insurer money because interventions will be reduced.  Any reasonable insurer, while not mandating a woman to do any of these things, will provide her the coverage to do these things if she so chooses.  By honoring a woman's own wisdom about her reproductive choices, insurers win as does the dignity of the woman, who is given every opportunity to control her reproductive destiny. 

Midwives as health educators

  • Jul. 16th, 2009 at 12:21 AM

I made what may have seemed to be a nonsequitor comment to a post over at RHRealityCheck.org.  I love the post, and I really agree with everything it has to say about promoting reproductive health in the Latina community; what the post advocates as beneficial to Latinas is beneficial to all women throughout their reproducitve years.  And I think midwifery care has a vital role to play in that. 

Women carrying wanted pregnancies are prime targets for wellness promotion and health education.  We are motivated to make the best choices for our babies, and no matter what we learned in health class, it was not enough.  For many of us, we learned next to nothing about the workings of our bodies, in pregnancy or otherwise.  Midwives are knowledgable about sexual health, contraception, nutrition, and anatomy and physiology with a special focus on the reproducitve process.  We are entry points for well women into the health care system.  In the process of helping women stay healthy in pregnancy & prepare to give birth, midwives share their knowlege and trust that the woman knows best in her own lives.  As we provide our clients with full infomed consent, allowing them room choose the interventions the find valuable during the childbearing year, help them learn to negotiate the healthcare system.  Using models like Centering Pregnancy, women can learn from us how to provide their own healthcare.  In this model, women leave pregnancy feeling nurtured, having gained life skills that will serve them as mothers and beyond.  Community doula programs can provide similar education and empowerment.  But these care models, including doulas and midwives (direct-entry Certified Professional Midwives as well as Nurse-Midwives) need to be avaiable to all women, regardless of income or insurance overage.  If midwifery is a vital component of health care reform, it can also save billions of dollars and improve maternal and child health, which is abysmal in this supposedly advanced nation. 

I look forward to serving women as a midwife, and I want more women to become inspired to serve their communities in this way.  

I HEART RHRealityCheck.org

  • Jul. 7th, 2009 at 11:02 AM

I am honored that one of my favorite repro-justice pages has featured the previous post on their front page, which I included in my reader diary there.  RHRealityCheck.org is an excellent source for earnest people trying to make sense of reproductive rights in a way which honors the human dignity of women.  I am so grateful for their work.